Category

RPAS World News

airprox

How to upset an ATCO with a UAV

By | RPAS World News | No Comments

A recent report, from the John A. Volpe National Transportation Center, prepared for the FAA, presents an analysis of 220 reports of the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) related to UAVs. The ones filled by Air Traffic Control Operators (ATCOs) are of particular interest as they are crucial players for the integration of UAS in controlled airspaces.

On top of different statistics concerning the events, the report puts forward seven events particularly surprising for ATCOs:

  • An unanticipated appearance of the UAV in the airspace;
  • Difficulties to contact the UAS pilot;
  • The UAV does not comply with pre-coordinated route;
  • The UAV cannot accept (comply with) an instruction issued by the ATCO;
  • The behavior of the UAV is unexpected; and
  • The required actions for the controller are unknown or unclear.

When reading this report, keep in mind that most of these encounters imply military UAS pilots, which explains the high number of remote pilots disregarding ATC instructions.

This type of study is very useful when designing Real Time Simulations with ATCOs in the loop. Indeed, it allows creating worst case scenarios to experiment with ATCOs workload while representing realistic scenarios.

jarus_categories

The SORA finally out for external consultation

By | RPAS World News | No Comments

According to the JARUS operational categorization, drone operations fall into one of three categories: A, B and C (or  Open, Specific and Certified in EASA vocabulary). Flying in category A just requires to follow a fixed set of rules (altitude limitation, mandatory equipage, etc) while flying in category C requires a certified drone system. To operate in category B, an operator needs to demonstrate that operational risks are mitigated by available systems; such demonstration requires a risk assessment approach.

However existing safety tools are complex to use and not always suited to drone operation specificities. In order to provide adapted, accessible and universal tools to the drone community, the JARUS WG-6 developed the Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA), a somewhat simple yet powerful methodology allowing to perform risk assessment for drone operations. The full description of the SORA methodology has been recently published for external consultation on the JARUS website.

Though it is unlikely that using the SORA will be mandatory (other risk assessment methods will remain an option), its design will probably make it the best choice for operators willing to build a safety case. So if you plan on using drones in category B scenarios, you can start reading this document as it is likely to become your bedside book. For those interested, we will publish a more detailed article on the SORA methodology in the months to come.

drones_h

Along the way through integration – PART 1 : A-NPA – Introduction

By | ENAC, RPAS World News | No Comments

EASA has been assigned by European Commission to develop two main aspects:

1. EU Regulatory Framework for drone operation

2. Proposals for the regulation of low-risk drone operations, key elements of the future Implementation Rules (IRs)

With a starting point in Riga Declaration, and building up on Regulations (EC) No 216/2008 (‘Basic Regulation’), A-NPA introduces three main category of operations.

Read More
drone_power_line

All about drones for the Electric Industry

By | RPAS World News | No Comments

As UAS technology and regulation evolve, more missions get added to the list of drone applications. Among the earliest to be identified were the missions related to the electric industry (e.g. power line surveillance, windmill inspection). Last month (February), the Oak Ridge National Laboratory released a 168p survey entitled: “An Early Survey of Best Practices for the Use of Small UAS by the Electric Utility Industry”.

Read More